NadirAlphaNA EN · DE · ES · FR · HI · 中文 · عربي · PL
Advertisement
Advertisement

Block M · Risk management & risk analysis

‹ Financial markets handbook: overview

Independent working reference. Product and feature names mentioned are trademarks of their respective owners. No investment advice.

Risk management does not mean avoiding risks but choosing, measuring, limiting and surviving them deliberately; the order is the program: identify, measure, steer, report.

151 · Risk types at a glance (market, credit, liquidity, operational risk)

Definition: Market risk (prices), credit risk (default), liquidity risk (tradability/refinancing), operational risk (processes, systems, people); plus concentration and model risk as cross-cutting themes.

Use: A completeness checklist for every risk inventory.

Interpretation: The crisis rarely comes from the measured category; operational and liquidity risks are chronically underestimated.

Typical mistake: Narrowing risk management to market risk.

See also: 152 · Market risk & factor models · 153 · Credit risk parameters (PD, LGD, EAD) · 154 · Liquidity risk (market vs. funding)

152 · Market risk & factor models

Definition: Loss potential from price moves; factor models decompose it into systematic drivers (rates, spread, equity market, style, currency) plus security-specific components.

Use: Making hidden bets visible; assigning risk budgets per factor.

Interpretation: Two "different" portfolios can have identical factor profiles.

Typical mistake: Looking only at position weights instead of factor exposures.

153 · Credit risk parameters (PD, LGD, EAD, expected loss)

Definition: PD = probability of default, LGD = loss given default, EAD = exposure at default; expected loss = PD x LGD x EAD.

Use: Assessing credit risks beyond the rating; provisioning/pricing logic.

Interpretation: Same rating, different LGD (collateral, rank!) mean different risk.

Typical mistake: Looking only at PD; the rank decides the loss size (see the liability cascade in ch. 5-B).

See also: 129 · Internal ratings & probability of default · 16 · High yield

154 · Liquidity risk (market vs. funding liquidity)

Definition: Market liquidity (a position not sellable without a price discount) vs. funding liquidity (payment obligations cannot be met).

Use: Liquidity classes per position; stress planning (commitments, margin calls, withdrawals).

Interpretation: Liquidity disappears in correlation with falling prices; planned sale sources dry up simultaneously.

Typical mistake: Not mirroring liquidity needs (PE capital calls, taxes) against liquidity sources under stress.

155 · Counterparty risk (counterparty, issuer risk in certificates)

Definition: Default of the counterparty of OTC transactions, deposits or certificates before fulfilment.

Use: Limits per counterparty; collateralization, clearing, diversification of banks.

Interpretation: Hidden counterparty risk sits inside products (certificates, swap ETFs, TRS).

Typical mistake: Overlooking the issuer risk of certificates held as a "bond substitute".

See also: 57 · Certificates (structure, issuer risk) · 66 · Credit default swaps (CDS)

156 · Concentration risks

Definition: Dominance of single securities, issuers, sectors, countries or factors in overall risk.

Use: Limits (e.g. max 5% per issuer); family wealth: think business stake + portfolio together!

Interpretation: Risk contribution counts, not capital weight; 10% in a high-vol stock can represent 30% of the risk.

Typical mistake: Not including the family business outside the portfolios in the concentration calculation.

157 · Currency risk in the portfolio

Definition: Value change from FX moves of all non-EUR positions (also indirectly: a EUR ETF on US equities carries USD risk).

Use: Measuring the exposure, setting the hedge ratio (see 77).

Interpretation: The fund currency is NOT the currency risk; what counts is the currency of the underlyings.

Typical mistake: Confusing a EUR share class with currency-hedged ("hedged" must say so explicitly).

See also: 77 · Currency hedging in the portfolio

158 · Stress tests & scenario analyses (historical, hypothetical, forward-looking)

Definition: Revaluing the portfolio under defined shocks; historical (2008, 2020, 2022), hypothetical (+200bp, -30% equities) or forward-looking (rate paths).

Use: Testing loss tolerance BEFORE it happens; communication with family/committees ("what if").

Interpretation: Scenarios complement VaR exactly where it is silent (extreme events, correlation breaks).

Typical mistake: Running only historical scenarios; the next crisis rhymes, it does not repeat.

See also: 159 · Monte Carlo simulation · 116 · Value at Risk (VaR)

159 · Monte Carlo simulation

Definition: Thousands of random paths from assumptions on return, vol and correlation; yields result distributions instead of point forecasts.

Use: Withdrawal plans, goal achievement probabilities, foundation payout ratios.

Interpretation: The result is only as good as the assumptions; above all the correlation assumptions.

Typical mistake: The normal distribution assumption: extreme risks are systematically underestimated.

160 · Tail risk, skewness & kurtosis (why volatility is not enough)

Definition: Properties of the distribution tails; skewness (asymmetry) and kurtosis (fat tails) reveal what volatility conceals.

Use: Correctly classifying premium-collecting strategies (option selling, carry, cat bonds): steady gains, rare large losses.

Interpretation: Negative skewness + high kurtosis = "up the stairs, down the elevator".

Typical mistake: Comparing Sharpe ratios across strategies with different skewness.

See also: 110 · Volatility (historical/implied) · 116 · Value at Risk (VaR)

161 · Risk budgeting & risk parity

Definition: Allocation by risk contributions instead of capital weights; risk parity = equal risk contribution per building block (often with leverage on bonds).

Use: Deliberate distribution of risk; an alternative to the 60/40 capital logic.

Interpretation: 60/40 in capital is ~90/10 in risk; equities dominate almost every mixed portfolio.

Typical mistake: Overlooking the risk parity leverage risk (the 2022 rate rise!).

See also: 117 · Correlation & diversification effect · 141 · Strategic vs. tactical asset allocation

162 · Drawdown management & stop-loss logic

Definition: Rules for loss limitation: loss thresholds with allocation reduction, trend filters, re-entry rules.

Use: Mandates with hard loss limits; protecting risk capacity.

Interpretation: Every loss limitation costs return (whipsaw); what matters is the re-entry rule, not the exit.

Typical mistake: Regulating the exit and leaving the re-entry to gut feeling; that turns protection into permanent cash.

163 · Hedging with derivatives (application perspective)

Definition: Bringing Block E together into the risk toolbox: index puts (crash), futures (lowering the allocation fast), FX forwards (currency), swaps/swaptions (rates), CDS (credit).

Use: Choosing the instrument by risk type, horizon and cost budget.

Interpretation: Perfect hedges are expensive; usually hedging the unbearable part (tail) suffices, not every fluctuation.

Typical mistake: Hedging after the crash (vol expensive) and unwinding before the next rise.

See also: 147 · Hedging strategies (overview) · 59 · Futures

164 · Risk tools: Bloomberg PORT/MARS, Aladdin, BlackRock Portfolio 360

Definition: PORT (the Terminal standard: factor risk, VaR, scenarios), MARS (multi-asset/derivatives, additional license), Aladdin (the institutional full platform), BlackRock Portfolio 360 (free Aladdin-based analysis for professionals, see chat note 17.08.2026).

Use: The tool by complexity and budget; 360 as a free second opinion, PORT as the daily workhorse.

Interpretation: Models of the same family share blind spots; a second model with a different methodology is valuable.

Typical mistake: Adopting model results without a plausibility check (one's own back-of-the-envelope duration/beta calculation).

See also: 165 · Risk reporting & limit systems

165 · Risk reporting & limit systems

Definition: Regular reports (exposure, risk, performance, limit utilization) plus an escalation process on a breach.

Use: The governance close of the loop; in a family office the basis of the family/advisory board report.

Interpretation: Good reports are short, comparable over time and show changes, not just holdings.

Typical mistake: Documenting limit breaches but having no defined escalation path.

‹ Back to overview